The latest outrage from Hawaiian Judge Derrick Kahala Watson—a third strike by this particular judge against not only Trump, but America:
Judge Temporarily Halts New Version of Trump’s Travel BanBy Vivian Yee, NYT, October 17, 2017
Hours before it was to take effect, a federal judge in Hawaii issued a nationwide order on Tuesday blocking, for now, President Trump’s third attempt at a travel ban. It would have indefinitely stopped almost all travel to the United States from seven countries, including most of the Muslim-majority nations included in his original travel ban.
Tuesday’s ruling was yet another legal setback for one of Mr. Trump’s earliest and most controversial efforts. The judge, Derrick K. Watson of Federal District Court in Honolulu, had previously blocked Mr. Trump’s second travel ban from taking effect in March. The White House’s first executive order sharply limiting travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries was blocked by a federal judge in Seattle.
The third executive order went further than the original, imposing permanent restrictions on travel instead of the original 90-day suspension. Under the newest version, most citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea were to be excluded from entering the United States, while citizens of Iraq and some groups of people in Venezuela who attempted to visit the United States would have faced extra barriers to entry. It was scheduled to go into effect on Wednesday.
“Professional athletes mirror the federal government in this respect: they operate within a set of rules, and when one among them forsakes those rules in favor of his own, problems ensue,” Judge Watson wrote in his order on Tuesday. The third travel ban, Judge Watson wrote, “suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor.”
The Justice Department did not immediately respond to the ruling on Tuesday. Judge Watson’s earlier ruling on the second version of the travel ban was upheld by an appeals court, but the Supreme Court allowed portions of that travel ban to take effect.[More]
Previous NYT coverage of this:
The last item on that list reminds me of Times's February 8 editorial After Mr. Trump’s Din, the Quiet Grandeur of the Courts. The New York Times simply does not believe in democracy. Trump was elected partly to block Muslim immigration, which is certainly within the powers of the Presidency (Obama did it briefly in 2011, but didn't get this kind of reaction because people knew he didn't mean it.) The Times thinks that unelected judges—who are New York Times readers—have a right to stop this.
Previous VDARE.com Coverage of Travel Ban Sabotage
