On Saturday Nigel Farage tweeted an extract from Channel migrants given right to work in UK, by Charles Hymas, The Telegraph, January 19, 2024. The story announces that the U.K. Government has been quietly granting work permits to these invaders, allowing employers to pay only 80% of the going rate (so undercutting wages) while they still retain access to subsidized accommodation and food! (No wonder they can accept 20% lower wages.)
Farage correctly says:
This is a disaster. Once the traffickers can advertise jobs and free board, even more will want to come.
This is a disaster. Once the traffickers can advertise jobs and free board, even more will want to come. The Rwanda policy is completely irrelevant in comparison to this. pic.twitter.com/Bl21dt3dc9
— Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) January 20, 2024
Last year in Record U.S. Border, U.K. Channel Immivasions. Why Now? I quoted of then new Prime Minister Rishi Sunak
… when he was Chancellor, Mr Sunak blocked a £200 million plan to help tackle the problem by paying for detention facilities for asylum seekers…
A source said: ’He never bothered to attend a single meeting of the small boats task force. He wanted asylum seekers to be “dispersed into the community“, but that made it impossible for them to be tracked, and many just disappeared.’
I commented:
In other words, the U.K. has a Prime Minister disinclined to obstruct immigration, probably for heritage reasons.
For this I was attacked by a Social Media commenter who was outraged that I should suggest a man born in the U.K., and treated to the finest fruits Britain could offer, would put his alien heritage ahead of protecting his host community. Sunak, I was assured, was a reliable English gentleman.
Of course, I was right. Sunak has predictably done absolutely nothing to check this influx of non-Christian colored people like him. And he is a member of the “Conservative Party”!
There is a hugely important for Americans. Hindus in the UK have a tendency to join the Conservatives, in large part because the alternative Labour Party has become heavily influenced by Muslims .
This is not what has happened in America. Here, politically alert Hindus have grasped the potential of the “Blacks with Brains” role and sign up as Coalition of the Fringes enforcers: Immigrant Activist Nandini Jammi Trying To Ruin Revolver News—These Indian Invaders Take No Prisoners.
But even when less actively political, Indians have frequently used their corporate power to repress immigration patriots: “The Indian CEO Virus”—Is It Good For The Historic American Nation?. And of course their ethnic discrimination habits within firms are notorious, as efficiently expounded in More on Indian Atrocities.
The Indian sub-continent is an extremely complex mosaic of ethnicities, religions, and castes who have been mercilessly competing with one another for over a thousand years. Why should importing them here change this?
Giving high political office to these people (Hindu or Muslim) runs the high risk that anti-white ethnic particularism will govern policy and that national institutions will be slighted. Consider Scotland’s Pakistani-born First Minister’s betrayal last week: Humza Yousaf: I was never comfortable with ’’national’ in SNP name, by Xander Elliards, The National, January 18, 2024.
America BEWARE!
