Earlier, by James Fulford: Yes, Virginia (DARE), There IS Hispanic “Ethnic Specialization” In Child Rape. The Totalitarian Left Just Doesn’t Want You To Know.

Rape-denier and Leftist vigilante Alex Kotch [Tweet him] Is back with his attempt to stop Dissident Right groups being funded:

At a 2017 conference hosted by the white nationalist hate group American Renaissance, Peter Brimelow, spoke about President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.

“Crime in this country is ethnically variegated,” claimed Brimelow, president of the white nationalist hate group the VDARE Foundation. “There’s ethnic specialization in crime. And Hispanics do specialize in rape, particularly of children. They’re very prone to it, compared to other groups.”

Blatantly racist statements like these are commonplace for Brimelow and for Jared Taylor, president of American Renaissance, two of the most notorious white nationalist leaders in the United States.

“Dark Money ATM of the Conservative Movement” Gives $1.5 Million to White Nationalist Hate Group, by Alex Kotch, Exposedbycmd.org, December 4th, 2020  [Emphases added. links to SPLC in original.]

Here he is being outraged on Twitter about laws protecting donor privacy:

The reason: invoking (or evoking, Kotch seems unclear) the NAACP is bad is because they're merely BLACK Nationalists, and partake of the sacredness of the Civil Rights cause of forty or fifty years ago. The decision NAACP v. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958) (it says 1968 above, but that's because CEO Bader was speaking from memory—they fixed it on the ExposedByCMD website) said, briefly that "To require disclosure of an association's membership lists, a state must have a compelling justification for this infringement on the right of free association."

This is because, at the time, Alabama had a white government, which might discriminate in some way against black donors, or pro-black white donors. Also white-owned businesses in Alabama might use lists of donors to refuse to provide service in some way.

SCOTUS thought that was wrong. But since the Constitution is color-blind, whites have, believe it or not, the same Constitutional rights blacks had under the Jim Crow South...and less chance of enforcing them, most of the time.

But what's really annoying about this article is that it's repeating the quote from Peter Brimelow (from Q and A at the 2017 Amren Conference) about ethnic specialization in crime, with Hispanics committing more child rape, without acknowledging THAT IT'S TRUE.

I wrote a lengthy article in March, 2019, responding to a previous Kotch attack, called Yes, Virginia (DARE), There IS Hispanic “Ethnic Specialization” In Child Rape. The Totalitarian Left Just Doesn’t Want You To Know. Typically, he doesn't engage with, or link to, any of it.

Below, some excerpts from my 2019 piece:

But is it true that Hispanics specialize in the rapes of children? OF COURSE IT IS—and if you read Ann Coulter's  Adios America, you know that, too. In fact, Chapter 11 is titled Why Do Hispanic Valedictorians Make The News, But Child Rapists Don’t? First of all, it’s a different culture in Mexico, where the age of consent is 12.

In 2007, Brenda Walker wrote a column here called The Top Ten Reasons Why the US Should Not Marry Mexico.

#10 The legal age of heterosexual consent in Mexico is 12.

As with many laws, there is some diversity according to locale and other variables, but this discussion of statutes agrees that 12 is the legally acceptable age for straight sex to occur in Mexico.

Mexican men have a reputation for leering and worse at little girls, which shouldn't surprise us, since sex with children is socially acceptable in Mexico. Fifteen-year-old girls have a ceremony called a Quinceañera which announces their availability to become wives, mothers and girlfriends. In America, children of that age are expected to complete three more years of high school, to be followed hopefully by a college education. But in Mexico, young girls are considered available, according to law and custom.

Ann Coulter detailed, among other things, the astoundingly young pregnancies found in the Hispanic community in the US, and in Latin America. This is an “ethnic specialization” thing—this is a public health problem South of the Border, and now north of it as well.

Quote from Adios America, chapter 11:

The prevalence of freakishly young birth mothers in Latin America confirms the reports. According to CNN, 318 ten-year-old girls gave birth in Mexico in 2011 and in the Mexican state of Jalisco alone 465 girls between the ages of ten and fourteen gave birth. In the last quarter century, there’s been one reported case of an American impregnating a girl that young.

You might have noticed from headlines like these—or you would if you lived in Britain, the only place where such headlines might ever appear:

• ‘Girl Aged Nine Who Gave Birth to Baby in Mexico Didn’t Realize She Was Pregnant until Seven Months—and Her Mother Didn’t Think It Was a Crime’
• ‘Argentine Schoolgirl, 12, Gives Birth to Twin Sons (on Same Day Mexican Nine-Year-Old Became a Mother)’
• ‘Tribal Law Protects Boy, 15, Who Impregnated 10-Year-Old Colombian Girl from Under-Age Sex Charges’

I also had a list of headlines, which I'll excerpt: